Technical SEO FAQ · Technical SEO Strategy & Foundations
What technical SEO assumptions do experienced teams still get wrong?
Common assumptions include:
- Crawled means indexed.
- Indexed means ranking.
- A 200 response means the page is SEO healthy.
- robots.txt is an index-removal mechanism.
- Google cannot process JavaScript.
- Every crawler warning should be fixed.
- More indexed URLs means better SEO.
- A canonical is an absolute directive.
- Core Web Vitals scores guarantee ranking.
- A large URL count automatically means a crawl-budget problem.
Google's documentation explicitly separates crawling, indexing and serving, and states that technical eligibility does not guarantee indexing or ranking.
Sources
Related questions
- How do you balance technical SEO recommendations with development constraints?
- How do you define technical SEO at an organizational level?
- How do you distinguish between an SEO problem and a website engineering problem?
- How do you measure the business impact of technical SEO?
- How do you prioritize technical SEO issues when there are hundreds of problems?
- What does an advanced Technical SEO audit look like?
- What does technical SEO mean beyond crawling, indexing and fixing errors?
- What is your process for deciding whether a technical SEO issue is worth fixing?
- What percentage of an SEO roadmap should be dedicated to technical SEO?
Community answers
No community answers yet.
Log in to answer Members can add their own answer and like others.
